grantwarkentin.com

someone's gotta be the lightning rod.

Browsing Posts in Computers

Apple’s iTunes is great – if you have an iPod.

Which I don’t anymore, since my preschooler daughter accidentally knocked it on to the tile floor. All it does now is show me the “sad iPod” icon which was cute the first time I saw it but now taunts me with its dead eyes.

Sad iPod is sad.

Sad iPod is sad.

I even took the little guy apart. It wasn’t hard – it’s a 5th-generation iPod with a little hard drive, and I was able to pry it open with my fingernails. I tried to see if it could be fixed by resetting a cable, but no luck. I think the hard drive is toast.

Apple can fix it for $130, plus shipping. Forget it. Instead, I spent $60 on a Sandisk Sansa View. It’s not as elegant as the iPod, its menu system is OK but not what I’m used to and it’s got a lot less memory than the old iPod (eight GB compared to 30).

But it was on sale.

It’s smaller and uses flash memory instead of a little hard drive. And apparently it plays videos too, but I haven’t played around with that feature yet.

Best of all, it lets me put files on through drag-and-drop. Easy. The View automatically organizes files based on the information in the ID tags written into the file, letting me play albums, which is what I prefer.

This works with all the MP3s I’ve made myself, ripping my CDs with Exact Audio Copy. I gave up on iTunes’ built-in ripper ages ago when I found it was creating files with random popping errors. EAC is slower, but no errors. Plus, it tags files with standard ID tags.

Which, apparently, iTunes does not. When I tried to play some of the songs I’d bought with iTunes on my View, the songs showed up in the menu all out of order and the album art was missing. In fact, the art for a lot of my albums was missing, even though I had added it in iTunes.

I guess iTunes must not write the data into the tag, storing it on the computer and on the iPod or something. Whatever. It’s stupid. Stick to industry standards, please!

So, after a few hours with MediaMonkey, I have re-organized my music  and everything is all tagged, embedded with artwork and working properly. I hope I never have to use iTunes again.

I might try to fix my iPod again, but this time I think I’m going to try this method. It just might work:

It’s nice. It’s very nice. Faster than Firefox, less hits to the slow little SSD in my AspireOne netbook. This, I like. I will see how this does over the long-term. If Google wants the netbook market, this will be the way to get it.

Chrome for Linux

I am using Ubuntu 9.04 on an Acer AspireOne netbook (with the slow 8 GB SSD) and so far, performance is better than Firefox 3.0.17 (the latest version officially supported for Ubuntu, which has been giving me strange error messages for Gears ever since the last update. Not good, because I want to use Google Docs offline.

Now to test how Chrome and Docs and Gears all play together…

EDIT: Bwa hahahahaha Gears is not supported in Chrome?!

“What does Gears require to be compatible with my Linux system?

If you’d like to run the Gears for Firefox on a Linux (32-bit) platform, please make sure your system has glibc 2.3.5 or higher and libstdc++6 (Gears 0.3) or libstdc++5 (Gears pre-0.3).”

Off to the package manager then…

ANOTHER Edit:

OK, for whatever reason, Gears and Chrome and Linux do not work together. That’s an irritant. The only reason I want Gears is so I can sync my documents online and offline. I have some stuff I would hate to lose, and I like having it in an online location and on my netbook.

So I found a way to do it backwards, which is actually better. There’s an extension for OpenOffice which lets you export whatever document you’re working on to your Google Docs account. It lets you import from Google Docs too, but I haven’t tried that yet. Just click the icon, and voila, punch in your account name and password, and the document is in or out of Google Docs. Google Docs has no problem with Open Document format.

It was a bit of a pain in the ass to set up though. The default OpenOffice installation in the netbook remix version I’m using is pretty bare bones, and the extension requires some Java extras. The easiest way to make it work was to open up the Synaptic Package Manager, look up OpenOffice and install the latest Canonical version (the one with the icon beside it). That triggered all the dependent files to be installed or reinstalled too, and after that it was easy to install the extension — just run the OpenOffice extension manager, look for the downloaded extension file and voila. Done.

So with that problem solved, I love Chrome, and I love OpenOffice again. Google Docs is now a storage solution. As long as I remember to export the document before I close it, everything will be synchronized.

Why e-books are stupid

3 comments

E-books trend is paradise lost for book nerds

Satan expelled from Paradise
Angels tease Satan because he doesn’t
have the latest e-book reader gadget.

The experience of finding an unexpected treasure in a used book store always gives me a buzz.

Guess I’m a book nerd.

This summer, at a dusty old shop in New Westminster, my attention was captured by an ugly, leather-bound monstrosity on the bottom shelf in the poetry section. Burned into the thick leather cover by an amateur hand was a picture of a log cabin in a forest by a river, with the word “Milton” underneath.

I sat down in the aisle, my back resting against a stack of dog-eared Beatles records, and opened the stiff leather cover. Inside was a homemade leather bookmark attached to the cover, as stiff as a steel-toed boot. I flipped it out of the way to discover a rare treasure – a 125-year-old printing of John Milton’s “Paradise Lost.”

The pages were gilt, like an expensive Bible, and the engraved illustrations exquisite. The words appeared to gently rise off the page, a side-effect of the printing techniques and quality paper used in making books a century ago.

But that wasn’t the best part. As I flipped through the pages, I came across an unusual bookmark – a carefully-clipped piece of newspaper, an 1897 birth announcement for Nellie McClung’s first-born son. Nellie McClung, who Canadian women can thank for fighting to get them the right to vote in 1916. It made me wonder whose book this once was.

I looked at the home-made cover again. Obviously someone loved this book enough to recover it once the original cover tore off. I imagined McClung, or her son, sitting by the woodstove on a freezing cold Manitoba night, reading by flickering firelight one of the greatest works of English literature.

I caught a whiff as I closed the cover again and brought it to my face to take a sniff. My nostrils filled with the aromatic smell of pipe tobacco. I again imagined one of the McClungs sitting on their porch at dusk, reading the book and smoking a pipe.

Guess I’m a romantic book nerd.

Fighting to keep a neutral, disinterested expression on my face, I dropped $8 in toonies into the hand of the bored-looking store owner and carried my treasure out of the store, striding nonchalantly around the corner before I felt it safe to crack a huge grin. I have no idea if the book’s actually worth anything and I don’t really care. To me, it’s priceless.

That’s why I think e-books are stupid. Once we’re all reading disposable Word documents on yet more Internet-enabled glowing rectangles, who will go into used bookstores looking for priceless treasures?

I also wonder what will happen to our libraries. It seems people would rather spend $300 to $400 for an awkward Star Trek display pad device that lets them read Dan Brown books electronically, looking like quasi-futuristic idiots in the airport lounge, than go to the library and borrow a book for free.

I suppose there must be some good reason to drop that kind of cash on a device to read books you can get for 50 cents at the thrift store, but I don’t know what it is. I’ve tried e-books. I’ve read lots of books on my Palm Pilot, mostly during city council meetings. It’s not fun, and not just because I’m at a council meeting.

The only good thing about e-books is the massive amount of classic books available for free through Project Gutenberg. For some of them, it’s worth staring at a glowing rectangle. Other than that, I can only think of two reasons why paper books will someday be replaced with e-books: one, humans are technology magpies who will adopt anything that looks futuristic and shiny, and two, there’s a lot of money to be made from them. Ergo, the powers that be will do whatever it takes to make them the de facto standard.

And there is a lot of money to be made. E-books sell online in Sony’s e-book store from 50 cents on a special deal to $10 for a new bestseller, to up to $20 for other “specialty” stuff. What a ripoff, it’s all the same to the publisher. Once the book is electronic, it costs them pennies to host a server somewhere for you to download it, regardless of whether it’s on “special” or not. A quick look through the store shows it’s actually cheaper to go buy a paper version you can read without charging the battery.

Out of curiousity, I found an electronic version of Paradise Lost in the store for $2, but I wouldn’t buy it. It’s just 3.5 megabytes of ones and zeros, and I’d never remember or absorb any of it by staring at a screen.

But I will remember and cherish the passages I read by firelight from my ugly, leather-bound monstrosity.

A deeper look: why e-books are stupid

As soon as you enter the electronic world, you quickly discover that not everything works the way you think it should.

I downloaded a pile of interesting (and free) books from Project Gutenberg, classics of religion, philosophy, archaeology and science. But some of the books displayed with errors on my Palm Pilot, and I had to mess around with changing settings, installing better reader software and formatting the downloaded files to work properly. Some of them were worth the hassle, others were not.

With a boring old paper book, you just open it up and start reading. It works on any platform, from tables to pillows to floors to your lap.

Holding an electronic device is just not as comfortable as a paperback, although engineers have tried valiantly to overcome this. You can read a paper book from any angle, and your eyes miraculously adjust in almost all lighting conditions to make reading comfortable. With an electronic device, you are stuck looking at a small, glowing rectangle which – at least in the case of my Palm – emits a slowly-maddening buzzing sound and is hard to see from even a slight angle.

Paper is the standard, whether e-book reader makers like it or not. I find it amusing that Sony’s e-reader offers “astonishing” paper-like display.

Why not just read a paper book, instead of an electronic device painstakingly designed to look like paper? What’s the appeal?

I guess you could argue that an e-reader lets you carry a whole library with you. But why? You can only read one book at a time anyway. When you’re finished the book, put it back on the shelf and take another one. Easy.

And be aware, e-books are not cheaper. A quick look through the e-book store run by Sony shows that while some books are available for 50 cents, and bestsellers are often on for about $10, the average price is the same or more than what you would pay for a paper book. This is absurd when you think about it. When books are first released, hardcovers are always more expensive, but those are the best quality. Wait six months or so for the $10 paperback if you don’t want to pay $30 for a hardcover. The price point for an average new e-book seems to be $13-14. Pretty pricey for something that only exists as ones and zeros.

I shouldn’t pick on Sony. There are other e-book sellers out there, but even if I wanted to buy an Amazon Kindle and download and read e-books, I can’t do it in Canada. Brilliant! Hooray for international copyright and digital rights management!

But I guess I must be one of a small number of people who think that paper book technology is just fine, thank you, and needs no electronic upgrade with all the headaches that brings. Even Disney has launched an e-book store which, for an annual fee, lets kids read “interactive” books featuring all their favourite Disney characters. Now, you don’t even need to read with your kids anymore, or encourage them to use their imaginations while reading a story. Disney will do it for you.

Do your kids a favour. Read with them. Read real books from your local library. Don’t just hand them another glowing rectangle to keep them amused while you watch TV.

Acer AspireOne netbook running Ubuntu 9.04 netbook remix

Acer AspireOne netbook running Ubuntu 9.04 netbook remix

I finally decided to install Ubuntu Linux Netbook Remix on my Acer AspireOne ZG5 (the one with the 8GB SSD drive). It’s performing very well — boots up in under one minute, shuts down in under 10 seconds and experiences very few of the SSD performance hangs common under Windows XP whenever the OS would hit the wimpy little solid-state drive.

It runs Firefox very well, and also runs GIMP, perfect for some basic photo manipulation for blog posts, etc. Software additions are fast and easy through the built-in Synaptic Package Manager, which finds all the files I need, installs and configures them for me.

And the built-in Totem Movie Player is fantastic, it found and downloaded all the necessary codecs and plays movies encoded for iTunes or DivX/xviD flawlessly. The player also has the ability to force movies to play in whatever aspect ratio I want, great for movies which have been incorrectly squished or stretched.

I have only two small problems. First, the wireless switch and LED do not work at all. However, this is purely cosmetic and the software wireless network connection manager works very well (better than the Windows equivalent). Second, the card reader on the right side of the computer does not work, unless I boot with an SD card in the slot. This is not a big deal since the left-hand card slot works fine, with or without a card in at boot, but if I ever want to make the right-hand slot work there is a workaround, adding “pciehp.pciehp_force=1″ (minus the quotes) to the kernel right after the line “ro quiet splash” (again minus the quotes). I can get at the appropriate file by opening a terminal window and typing “sudo gedit /boot/grub/menu.lst” (minus the quotes, duh) and entering the line as described above.

But it’s not a big deal, and I don’t really want to do it because it results in a few lines of code being displayed on startup and I want to keep it looking pretty so I can impress all my friends ;)

I’ve been playing around with the Ubuntu Linux netbook remix, a version of the Ubuntu Linux operating system designed specifically for small netbook computers like my Acer Aspire One.

I downloaded the bootable image and put it on a 4-gig Lexar Firefly flash drive. The netbook booted and ran just fine, and everything worked so well I am seriously contemplating ditching XP (which came preinstalled on the machine) for Ubuntu.

Here are some time trials. And FYI my netbook is the ZG5, with the 8 GB SSD (solid-state drive) built-in which has been critized for being very slow. Even running Ubuntu on a flash drive, I noticed the SSD seemed to be snappier, not pausing the system during saves/loads like in XP.

Here’s a rough comparison:

Windows XP: Took 2:23 to boot from power off to running web browser, connected to the Internet (running Google Chrome browser).

Ubuntu (on flash drive “Live CD”): Took 1:20 to get to desktop from power off, another 10 seconds to start Firefox. I bet it’s even faster running off the SSD.

Windows XP: Took five seconds to start AbiWord.

Ubuntu: Took 13 seconds to start pre-installed OpenOffice 3.0.

Windows XP: Took 27 seconds to start GIMP photo manipulation program.

Ubuntu: Took 18 seconds to start GIMP.

They’re pretty comparable. But the fast start-up time (and shut-down time) in Ubuntu is good for me. But even though I really like Ubuntu I don’t know if I will switch yet.

PROS: Ubuntu starts fast, shuts down fast, has a really nice user interface that’s easy to use, has good built-in games, has Open Office built-in and has a better wi-fi detection and connection system than Windows XP. SSD seems more responsive and fonts look nicer than XP.

CONS: Wi-fi switch and LED do not work in version of Ubuntu (9.04) I tested. Waking up from suspending machine opens up file system window for the LH SD card (always inserted on my machine). A known problem on the Aspire One is that the SD card slots do not work unless you boot with cards inserted in them. There are allegedly workarounds for this and the wifi LED issue,  but do I really want to fix them when Windows XP works as-is?

CONCLUSION: I like Ubuntu, and would be happy with it on my machine, but it’s a step sideways, not a step up. I might put it on though, for the faster boot and shut-down times and better use of SSD. Waiting several seconds every time a doc auto-saves is getting annoying, and it doesn’t seem to do that in Ubuntu. If they can fix the SD card and wifi LED and switch issues in the next release, I think I will definitely put it on.

New netbook

No comments

Got myself a little Acer Aspire One netbook for $300 at Staples. I really wanted a Macbook but I can’t justify $1,100 in debt for a computer. $300, on the other hand, I can actually pay off.
I’m not disappointed. I was a bit glum at its performance at first — I got the Windows XP Home 8GB solid-state hard driver version — but once I cleaned off the preinstalled crapola running in the background, it runs beautifully. I can use Facebook, my ScribeFire blogging plugin for Firefox and even watch videos (copied on to the free 8GB SD card included with the purchase) smoothly and work on my book project. It’s a beautiful little machine and I have come to love it so.
It even has a built-in webcam that works. It just works! After years of fighting with Windows machines it’s nice to have something that just works. Here’s a pic of myself I took with the webcam:

Yeah, I know. I just don’t like smiling for pictures, unless it’s genuine. My wife likes this one though.

Downtime

No comments

Haven’t blogged for a while. That’s partly because the home computer’s had a bit of downtime. I reinstalled Windows XP because it was acting strange. Things like burning a CD would fail, then work fine the second time. Jerky performance in games. Slow shutdown time and the occasional random error.
Time for a fresh start!
It was a lot less painful than in the past. I used nLite to make a custom Windows disc with all the latest service packs and updates, and drivers for all my hardware, so all I had to do was start the install and go read a book. When I came back a half-hour later, there was the desktop, sized to the correct resolution, connected to the Internet, and all ready to go. Awesome.
The hardest part was backing up my data so it was easy to restore. I backed up all my Firefox bookmarks, cookies, preferences and autocomplete stuff (I didn’t realize how much we rely on those things) and all my wife’s Thunderbird e-mails using a nifty program called MozBackup. But don’t use the latest version; use version 1.4.7 because 1.4.8 did not restore any of the e-mails, rendering it a pretty useless program. However, the older version worked flawlessly.
I was pleasantly surprised to find that reinstalling Steam into the same folder as before, where all the old data still resided, preserved all my old save games, data and preferences. Another advantage of dividing your hard drive into partitions – if you ever have to do a reinstall on the system partition, the impact on the other partitions is minimal. All my photos are in the same place, for example.
The only program that really gave me trouble was iTunes. I had to rebuild the entire library using a handy utility I can’t remember the name of right now (and I’m not posting from my home machine).
But once that was done, everything works great. It’s fast, stable, snappy and running in top shape.